SAMPLE REPORT — fictional client “TaskFlow” (taskflow.example), produced only to show format. Real reports audit your live site.

CiteScope AI Visibility Audit — TaskFlow

Audit date: 2026-11-04 · Scope: homepage, pricing, features, docs top pages · Overall: 41 / 100 — Partly visible

Executive summary

TaskFlow can be crawled by AI engines but is rarely citable: crawlers are allowed in, yet the pages never answer a buyer question in quotable form, pricing is locked in a script-driven app shell, and no third-party page names the product. Three blockers and five warnings were found. Fixing the top 3 items is estimated at under one developer-day.

Findings

GradeCheckFinding & evidence
🔴 BlockerNo server-rendered textHomepage HTML ships an empty app shell; the marketing copy renders only after JavaScript. Several AI crawlers fetch raw HTML — they see a blank page.
🔴 BlockerPricing not crawlablePrices exist only inside the logged-in app. No public pricing page; answer engines therefore never quote TaskFlow on price-related questions.
🔴 BlockerZero third-party mentionsNo directory listings, reviews or forum threads name the product. With no external corroboration, engines prefer competitors that others cite.
🟡 Warningrobots.txtGPTBot and ClaudeBot are allowed (good), but the sitemap line is missing, slowing discovery of new pages.
🟡 WarningStructured dataNo JSON-LD anywhere. Adding Product/Offer and FAQPage schema is a one-hour fix with outsized effect on machine understanding.
🟡 WarningHeadings are slogansH1 “Get more done, together” matches no buyer query. Question-style headings (“How much does TaskFlow cost?”, “TaskFlow vs Notion”) mirror how users ask AI.
🟡 WarningFirst paragraphs don’t answerSections open with brand story instead of a direct answer with numbers. Answer-first paragraphs are what engines quote.
🟡 WarningNo dates or authorsNo visible review dates; engines discount undated claims for fast-moving categories.
🟢 GoodLegal disclosureSeller information page is complete and linked from the footer — a trust signal.
🟢 GoodSitemap coveragesitemap.xml exists and lists 96% of public pages.

Spot-checked AI answers (sample)

Buyer questionWho gets citedTaskFlow?
“Best task manager for a small remote team?”Notion, Asana, ClickUpNot mentioned
“Cheap project management tool under $10/user?”Trello, BasecampNot mentioned (no public price)
“TaskFlow pricing”Third-party review blogsOwn site not cited

Top 5 fixes, in order

  1. Server-render (or pre-render) all marketing pages; verify with a raw-HTML fetch.
  2. Publish a public pricing page with prices in HTML text and a comparison table.
  3. Add Product + FAQPage JSON-LD to homepage and pricing.
  4. Rewrite the H1 and section headings into buyer questions; put the answer in the first paragraph.
  5. Get listed: 3 directories, 1 alternatives page (“TaskFlow vs …”), 2 community threads with genuine participation.

Methodology: fixed checklist (crawler access, indexability, structured data, answer-first content, citation readiness) + live answer spot-checks. CiteScope does not promise rankings or citations; it removes the structural reasons engines skip you.

← Back to CiteScope